davepermen at September 8th, 2004 04:39 — #1
i'd like to see a [ code = xml ] supported.. (would solve [ code = html ], too, i guess..)
[ code = lisp ] anyone?
nomadrock at September 8th, 2004 09:48 — #2
@Dia, why not setup a way for people to add submit new languages. Give people a set structure to put the keywords colors and such to make it easy for you to add them in. The obscure ones dont even have to be in the drop down box, you can just have a full listing of them in a faq someplace.
p.s. Dave, switch "mather" to "matter" in your sig
anubis at September 8th, 2004 09:52 — #3
mather... sounds like cockney for mother
davepermen at September 8th, 2004 10:45 — #4
snprbob86 at September 8th, 2004 23:21 — #5
XML would definitly be a welcome addition. I would also like to see support for Befunge (I think the official site is now down)
snprbob86 at September 8th, 2004 23:22 — #6
but no seriously... yay XML support
dk2 at September 9th, 2004 00:38 — #7
XML support will be on the way...
mihail121 at September 9th, 2004 01:14 — #8
Ok, and what about pascal?
dk2 at September 9th, 2004 01:38 — #9
Sure, just for Mihail: pascal too.
Actually, thinking about it, we might as well support syntax coloring for shaders (low-level + high-level) as well.
mihail121 at September 9th, 2004 01:58 — #10
But not only for me Dia, a lot of people actually use Delphi/Object pascal! You can't just turn the back to one of the best languages for all times, which even today is still quite used!
nomadrock at September 9th, 2004 03:19 — #11
I would like to see syntax highlighting for WhiteSpace
And maybe BrainFuck
snprbob86 at September 9th, 2004 19:39 — #12
Damn... Befunge just doesn't seem as funny next to WhiteSpace....
davepermen at September 10th, 2004 00:13 — #13
do we have assembler in yet? hm..